Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carley
That's not the point of this Dem show trial. Every Dem speaker has mentioned that they agree with the Reps and vice versa on almost all of the issues. The message is that they are not far apart on a deal.

The other message is that Obama is the one with the extended hand who is giving the Reps their day in court. And in the process, he gets to rebut every Rep speaker and then turn it over to a Dem to do likewise. The Dems have two-thirds of the time to make their case and to critique the Reps. It was a major mistake to get into this debate. There is no common ground on this bill.

2,639 posted on 02/25/2010 10:03:56 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2556 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
The message is that they are not far apart on a deal.

Yeah, and that's the VERY FIRST THING they have to dispel when they get back from this vote. Let the American people know they think this entire bill is a piece of crap and they're NOT buying into it. Then say it a second time, and a third.

Spin THAT, media politburo!

2,687 posted on 02/25/2010 10:10:41 AM PST by truthkeeper ("Why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2639 | View Replies ]

To: kabar

The republicans have won every single disagreement with the one.

You must be watching a different show.


2,688 posted on 02/25/2010 10:10:58 AM PST by Carley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2639 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
That's not the point of this Dem show trial. Every Dem speaker has mentioned that they agree with the Reps and vice versa on almost all of the issues. The message is that they are not far apart on a deal.

That's what Chris Wallace said on FNC. He said what the Dims are trying to achieve by that is to go on to use Reconciliation to ram through the bill and then say that the Republicans agreed with it. Looks to me like the Republicans are at least respectfully defending their opposition to the monstrosity.

I thought Reconciliation could be used only on existing law rather than on a bill that hasn't even passed.

2,799 posted on 02/25/2010 10:23:05 AM PST by arasina (So there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2639 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
Did YOU see that?! Before Obama rebutted Eric Cantor the first time, he was so angry (you could see it in his face) he popped his open hand with his fist! I had to rub my eyes...I could not believe his reaction was so uncontrolled.
3,189 posted on 02/25/2010 11:11:38 AM PST by stillfedup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2639 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson