Skip to comments.
Laptop family is no stranger to legal disputes (Webcamgate Lower Merion)
Philadelphia Inquirer ^
| 02/25/2010
| Larry King and Bonnie L. Cook
Posted on 02/25/2010 5:18:17 AM PST by Kid Shelleen
The vice chairman of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission could scarcely contain his scorn.
Before the commission was yet another appeal from a Philadelphia-area family, again seeking a break on unpaid electric and gas bills that by last year were closing in on $30,000.
This family lived in a $986,000 house on the Main Line. The breadwinner, until recently, had earned well more than $100,000 per year. Yet he and his wife were in hock to creditors, ranging from Uncle Sam to their former synagogue - and had regularly been stiffing Peco Energy for five years, breaking payment plan after payment plan
(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: arth; laptop; lowermerion; webcam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-224 next last
To: Kid Shelleen
Even so, it was the apparent failure to pay a fee - a $55 insurance payment to permit the Robbinses' son Blake to take his laptop home from Harriton High School - that might have prompted the district to activate the Web cam. Huh... That explains a lot in just that one paragraph. Kid gets laptop, doesn't pay up because family is broke from living well beyond their means, School activates LoJack looking for laptop...
Lawsuit.
A lot more plausible than the "peeping Tom" hyperbole being tossed around last week.
21
posted on
02/25/2010 5:40:49 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Girlene
And there it is.......otherwise, why would they activate the webcam if it wasn't stolen? Something about the program (LANRev) installed on the laptops that automtically activates the webcam when the laptop is opened.
http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/22/school-spying-infect.html
22
posted on
02/25/2010 5:42:15 AM PST
by
Abby4116
To: HereInTheHeartland
Or maybe there is more to the story . Maybe a tech savvy family member figured out how to do something to the laptop to create grounds for a lawsuit? Anything is possible That was my first thought. Perhaps something more complicated too. Lawyers, the family and a school insider. Just too much of a coincidence these low-lives were involved. But who knows? Maybe for once in their miserble lives they were victims and not users.
To: Graybeard58
yes, i keep telling my son there is more to car price
than just the purchase!
To: gussiefinknottle
Odds are their family trust took a beating last year and just can't provide that supplemental income they needed to live in a million dollar house.
On the other hand there are places (Fairfax County VA comes to mind) where million dollar homes are a glut on the market ~ everybody's got one ~ even after the fall in housing prices.
Well, not everybody, but enough of them that it's simply not uncommon for folks of modest means to have one ~ without furniture of course, and you must wear your winter coats indoors!
25
posted on
02/25/2010 5:46:49 AM PST
by
muawiyah
("Git Out The Way")
To: Abby4116
26
posted on
02/25/2010 5:48:18 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
Unbelievable. I live in a very big house. My electric bill doesn’t amount to more than $1000 a year. If we used gas that might come to another $1000.
*****
Do you live where the temp goes above 80 or under 60? In Maryland a gas&electric bill for a large house runs from $200 to $800 per month, depending on the season.
27
posted on
02/25/2010 5:49:57 AM PST
by
maica
(Freedom consists not in doing what we like,but in having the right to do what we ought. John Paul II)
To: Abby4116
I’m wrapping my laptop in ALUMINUM FOIL ! ! ! !
28
posted on
02/25/2010 5:50:00 AM PST
by
Huebolt
(Democrat = (national socialist) = NAZI)
To: Da Coyote
Funny you should say that. There is a story floating around with a picture of the father sitting with Hillary Clinton at a fund raiser. I hope the truth comes out and justice is served. Between the ding-bat school officials, plaintiff lawyers and well connected liberal elites, I doubt we will ever know all the facts.
'Webcam' father and Clinton
29
posted on
02/25/2010 5:55:48 AM PST
by
Kid Shelleen
(Keep your socialized health care off my body !!)
To: Dead Corpse
I have no problem with a program like this IF the laptop is supposed to be kept in school. But when they have to take them home, we are dealing with minors’ privacy here. The school has no right to “spy” on the student at home.
30
posted on
02/25/2010 5:56:34 AM PST
by
Abby4116
To: Wolfie
They remind me of Balloon Boys parents. And they might just have hit the jackpot with this one.
Haven't seen them interviewed, but after reading the article, it seems the family was living beyond their means because they were waiting on a judgement in which the father claims he is owed $5 million in commissions from a former employer. So they kept on spending while they waited for the case to be settled. They even owe money to the IRS. Ruh-roh.
Still, if the webcam was intentionally activated by the school, this should be pursued to ensure it doesn't happen again.
31
posted on
02/25/2010 5:57:04 AM PST
by
Girlene
To: Kid Shelleen
The family is a total trainwreck, based on the article.
To: conservativemusician
Hard to beleive its been 25 years. I gotta rent it again.
33
posted on
02/25/2010 5:58:45 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Abby4116
Something about the program (LANRev) installed on the laptops that automtically activates the webcam when the laptop is opened.
That could be. If so, it needs to be addressed. Still, a school official let the student know that he thought he had done something inappropriate in his home. So if it was accidently activated, someone intentionally looked at the results and acted on what they saw. Big mistake.
34
posted on
02/25/2010 6:01:19 AM PST
by
Girlene
To: NativeNewYorker
The family is a total trainwreck, based on the article The family may be a trainwreck, but that still doesn't give the district rights to monitor any student at home (using his own, school issued, laptop).
35
posted on
02/25/2010 6:01:21 AM PST
by
Abby4116
To: Abby4116
The school has no right to spy on the student at home. the argument could be made that they weren't spying on the kid per se, they were spying on the laptop that had been checked out and the insurance not paid for because the kids parents are deadbeats.
36
posted on
02/25/2010 6:02:31 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Abby4116
Check the link in post #26. That isn’t how the system works.
37
posted on
02/25/2010 6:03:07 AM PST
by
Dead Corpse
(III, Oathkeeper)
To: Kid Shelleen
This is funny:
Before filing the suit, lawyer Mark S. Haltzman said he had warned the family that its members' lives would be placed under a microscope.
"I absolutely advised them, because I know the low level that newspaper people will go to for a story," Haltzman said yesterday, "even if it has nothing to do with the merits of the case."
The Inquirer then proceeds to stoop to a low level by blasting the family for its financial problems.
Clearly the liberally-biased Inquirer is siding with the government (Lower Merion School District and the PUC). When the media becomes the government's ally, be very afraid.
38
posted on
02/25/2010 6:03:08 AM PST
by
Apparatchik
(If you find yourself in a confusing situation, simply laugh knowingly and walk away - Jim Ignatowski)
To: Girlene
In all the hype over this case, I’ve yet to see or hear one shred of evidence of wrongdoing by the school system. All of the speculation over “alleged” invasion of privacy is just that, speculation.
We do, however, have proof that the plaintiff is no stranger to filing lawsuits for fun and profit.
To: HereInTheHeartland
Maybe a tech savvy family member figured out how to do something to the laptop to create grounds for a lawsuit? The Network Tech for LMSD is in a promotional webcast for a remote monitoring product called LANRev. Read this blog post and you probably will think differently: The Spy At Harriton High
40
posted on
02/25/2010 6:03:49 AM PST
by
Born Conservative
("I'm a fan of disruptors" - Nancy Pelosi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 221-224 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson