And, if Stack’s family stands to profit? Why should it not go to the victim’s family?
OJ’s victim’s family will never collect. But you sue to keep it from happening.
I haven’t seen any indication that they stand to profit. What is it you know that we don’t? Share.
Because Stack's family didn't commit the crime, Stack did.
Let's say Stack's daughter writes a book about living with a man whose life was bedeviled by the IRS. Can the victim's family then sue the daughter?
We have a long standing legal and social principle that says we don't visit the sins of the father on the son, or in this case, the daughter.