[jocon307]

Just because the woman was afraid of her husband doesn’t at imply that she might see him as a threat to others.

Besides, we know how it works, unless he made an explicit threat calling the cops a saying “my husband’s nuts, I think he might do something bad” would not have resulted in any police action.

I also don’t see how seeking damages from the killer’s widow and prevent the autopsy being released can be put in the same action. But I suppose that is just more shoddy work from the MSM.

[Thumper1960]

It appears the media are reporting what it is.

I've learned that when a lawyer is involved, there's money to be had.

[OldDeckHand]

"I also don’t see how seeking damages from the killer’s widow and prevent the autopsy being released can be put in the same action."

Either can I, and I've been doing this for 25 years. But, I've seen it reported in too many outlets for it to be inaccurate. I think a more likely scenario is that the family of the victim picked the wrong counsel.

[pray4liberty]

Besides, we know how it works, unless he made an explicit threat calling the cops a saying “my husband’s nuts, I think he might do something bad” would not have resulted in any police action.

Tell that to the jury. You ought to be on Mrs. Stack's defense team. It may be a civil suit, but the way I read it, she is being treated like a criminal.

I have sympathy for both widows, but some John Edwards-esqe lawyer is trying to get blood out of a stone.