The whole case is about citizenship under the 14th Amendment for a child born of parents who were not eligible for citizenship under the so-called Chinese exclsuion laws as then in effect although they, the parents, were legally resident in this country. There does not seem to be any mention of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 in the case or the issue of presidential eligibility. Therefore, if by “it” that is what you are referring to then you woild appear to making a completely false assertion. Wouldn’t you agree?
Have you read the Wong case?
parsy