Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: parsifal
Where in Wong Kim Ark is there any discussion of Article II, Section 1, Clause 5? The principal authors of the 14th Amendment as a matter of record did not believe that they were changint Ar5icle II, Section 1, Clause 5, which, at that point, had been in existence for over 80 yearz.
140 posted on 02/26/2010 5:56:51 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: AmericanVictory

Its a fairly long case:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html

parsy, who will also try to scan it again;


141 posted on 02/26/2010 6:36:32 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

To: AmericanVictory

Oh, and the whole case is about it.

parsy


142 posted on 02/26/2010 6:38:08 PM PST by parsifal (Abatis: Rubbish in front of a fort, to prevent the rubbish outside from molesting the rubbish inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson