[patlin]

But the problem is that you are pulling tidbits from all over
_________________________________________________

I am doing no such thing. I cite a pertinent portion then link to the entire piece. I cite several sources as that is what a thorough researcher does.

And again, wikipedia is NOT a reliable source. It is a private site run by a DRONE and probably out of his mothers basement. Anyone can post and change things there and as we know per BHO’s bio, the page changes frequently as new information is discovered.

BTW, here is the link to my last post. I had an OOPS moment.

http://books.google.com/books?id=rHs8AAAAIAAJ&printsec=titlepage&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q=&f=false

[parsifal]

But you are using a 1903 book. Both law and procedure have changed a whole bunch since then. Do you have access to an online law library? Or an actual legal library?

If so, type Wong Kim Ark, and it will bring up every case that has cited it. Then you can see what the current state of the law is.

parsy