Replies

Has nothing to do with "moderates". They will always be who they are and even if you point them out, you accomplish NOTHING!

But by siding with the MSM in their attempt to get us at each others' throats, you have become a useful idiot to them and an accomplice.

If not, please tell me what GOOD you accomplish with your inside attacks so that I can fell all warm and fuzzy about it.

The liberals have to be laughing up their sleeves at us for all this infighting and doubly so because they were able to start it.

But by siding with the MSM in their attempt to get us at each others' throats, you have become a useful idiot to them and an accomplice.

What the hell are you talking about?...the "MSM" is late to this party.

This has been a recurring theme on many FR threads for at least a week...probably longer.

Levin has been on Beck's ass for a while now...after ACORN it seems Hannity has given him the cold shoulder. Most of the back and forth fighting has happened without the "MSM" even noticing. It wasn't until Beck addressed CPAC, and the subsequent escalation of attacks on Beck did the "MSM" finally notice. (And Rush was digging at Beck today.)

So, NO, this is NOT freepers being manipulated by the "MSM" into thinking there is conservative infighting, this is the "MSM" finally noticing what freepers have been dismayed about for a while.

For the record...I am a mild Beck fan, but mostly believe the more voices the better. And to clarify even further...if Beck began promoting a third party as an alternative, I would quickly join the ranks of the anti-Beckers, because I believe it is a horrible idea.

Does this sound familiar?

I have little interest in streamlining government or in making it more efficient, for I mean to reduce it's size. I do not undertake to promote welfare, for I propose to extend freedom. My aim is not to pass laws, but to repeal them. It is not to inaugurate new programs, but to cancel old ones that do violence to the Constitution, or that have failed their purpose, or that impose on the people an unwarranted financial burden. I will not attempt to discover whether legislation is "needed" before I have first determined whether it is Constitutionally permissable. And if I should be attacked for neglecting my constituent's "interests" I shall reply that I was informed that their main interest is Liberty, and in that cause I am doing the very best I can.

I abhore politicians that do not adhere to the majority of these ideals, and long to find a candidate that holds them all dear, as I do.

Obviously, your standards only are that they have (R) after their name.

Again, Sir, a pox upon you and like minded "conservatives".