[Christian_Capitalist]

Well, gee -- since Rand Paul is a registered Republican who is leading amongst Kentucky Republicans by almost a 2 to 1 margin, I guess that makes Rand Paul a Republican also, doesn't it? ~~ Go back to your post and read what you quoted from me to elicit that response. Then think for a minute. It really isn't that hard to comprehend.

Okay, so:

Allegra's definitions:

• Registered Republican who is supported by the largest bloc of Republicans = "Not a Republican".
• Whatever ex-Democrat RINO that Allegra supports for the sole reason that they're running against Rand Paul = "Republican"

Okay, I got it.

That's absurd. How is disagreeing with Governor Pailn's choices of endorsements "throwing her under the bus?" You really like hyperbole, don't you? Again, I support conservatives. Not moonbat, truther wacko libertarians who are infiltrating the GOP, motivated primarily by their own egos.

Yeah, well, you just keep blasting away at Sarah Palin's endorsements, and I'll sit back and watch with glee as Palin's support solidifies on Free Republic -- leaving you and "fieldmarshalj" out in the cold.

The Palin/Paul alliance will win in Kentucky -- and from there will become an important force in determining the future direction of the GOP at large. Bank on it.

[Allegra]

LOL - you've stepped over the edge, Paulbot. It doesn't take much with you guys, does it?

Keep on attributing things to me that I have never said. It's what Paulbots do. It just makes you look like an idiot.

You're just mad because I forced you to out yourself, aren't you? It wasn't even hard. You guys aren't fooling anybody but yourselves. {still laughing}