Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

I don’t support lying, this forum won’t be very good if people are just making things up, doesn’t that bother you even a little?

You didn’t deny, you didn’t defend, you simply tried a different tack, please address the lying first.


119 posted on 02/24/2010 8:22:22 PM PST by ansel12 (Social liberal politicians in the GOP are easy for the left to turn, why is that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

I’d address your accusation if I believed there was any merit to it. What exactly are you alleging I’m doing here ? I’ve stated that this candidate is dangerous to our national security. I believe he is willfully misrepresenting himself and misleading others as to what exactly he truly stands for. I accuse him of being the liar in that regard, and I do not trust him.

He claims at one point to not be like his father, and it simply doesn’t pass the smell test. When you have a candidate who is considered to directly inherit the mantle of his father’s ideology, who benefits from his father’s fundraising network, and has the same cadre of cult-like followers working and shilling for them, to claim they’re NOT carrying on as such is completely bullcrap. I say the old adage, “Where there’s smoke...” applies here.


171 posted on 02/25/2010 1:03:58 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson