I don’t support lying, this forum won’t be very good if people are just making things up, doesn’t that bother you even a little?
You didn’t deny, you didn’t defend, you simply tried a different tack, please address the lying first.
I’d address your accusation if I believed there was any merit to it. What exactly are you alleging I’m doing here ? I’ve stated that this candidate is dangerous to our national security. I believe he is willfully misrepresenting himself and misleading others as to what exactly he truly stands for. I accuse him of being the liar in that regard, and I do not trust him.
He claims at one point to not be like his father, and it simply doesn’t pass the smell test. When you have a candidate who is considered to directly inherit the mantle of his father’s ideology, who benefits from his father’s fundraising network, and has the same cadre of cult-like followers working and shilling for them, to claim they’re NOT carrying on as such is completely bullcrap. I say the old adage, “Where there’s smoke...” applies here.