There are lawyers who specialize in defending organized crime figures. That's fine; mafia dons have a right to legal representation. But should the attorney general hire a bunch of those lawyers to staff the department's organized crime section? And if he does, shouldn't we know about it?
1 posted on
02/23/2010 1:04:48 PM PST by
iowamark
To: iowamark
It would be interesting to know if the lawyers represented these terrorists pro bono.
To: iowamark
What a great point...how can Holder even retain his job with this type of conflict? It is amazing that a true revolt hasn’t happened yet.
3 posted on
02/23/2010 1:07:42 PM PST by
wac3rd
(Felipe Calderon supports the public option.)
To: iowamark
Some of the department's critics see things this way: There are lawyers who specialize in defending organized crime figures. That's fine; mafia dons have a right to legal representation. But should the attorney general hire a bunch of those lawyers to staff the department's organized crime section? And if he does, shouldn't we know about it? Damn straight we have a right to know.
4 posted on
02/23/2010 1:17:35 PM PST by
Cyropaedia
("Virtue cannot separate itself from reality without becoming a principal of evil...".)
To: iowamark
Are there any FReepers out there that are naive enough to still think KSM will be found guilty?
5 posted on
02/23/2010 1:52:54 PM PST by
sportutegrl
(VETO PROOF MAJORITY IN 2010)
To: iowamark
Thank you Byron York.
I vote that from now on, we refer to Eric Holder as Stonewall Holder.
To: iowamark
Great. Our top law enforcement official is one of the most criminal POS’s on the face of the earth right now.
9 posted on
02/24/2010 7:57:39 AM PST by
Dewey Revoltnow
(Worst. Community. Organizer. Ever!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson