Posted on 02/23/2010 10:04:58 AM PST by reaganaut1
A new state law that bolsters a superintendent’s ability to fire teachers at underperforming schools could be undermined in Boston because administrators routinely neglect a basic task: evaluating teachers.
About half the city’s approximately 5,000 teachers have not received an evaluation in the past two years, and a quarter of the city’s 135 schools have not conducted evaluations during that period, according to a report commissioned by the Massachusetts Business Alliance for Education that was provided to the Globe yesterday.
Under the law, superintendents can terminate teachers at a failing school only for “good cause,’’ elevating the importance of job evaluations to provide evidence for dismissal or as a way for teachers to challenge their firings.
The findings could also affect the debate in Boston on merit pay for outstanding teachers. Without regular evaluations, Boston leaders could face accusations of favoritism when determining which teachers should be rewarded.
The city’s teacher evaluation system is “utterly dysfunctional’’ and typical of a lack of teacher reviews in urban districts across the nation, according to Kate Walsh, president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, which conducted the study and characterizes itself as a nonpartisan research and advocacy organization.
“You need to have that formal record to make personnel decisions at the top and the bottom,’’ Walsh said last night.
The district’s inconsistency in job reviews was just one aspect of the 52-page report, which offered a mix of positive and critical points as it compared Boston with 99 other districts nationwide.
It praised the city’s teachers for having high attendance rates and strong academic credentials, when compared with teachers across the country, and the city for agreeing to offer teachers competitive salaries.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
A failing school’s problems usually go well above and beyond the teachers.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
Who evaluates the supervisors who are supposed to be evaluating the teachers?
I would imagine that the top of the pinnacle, realistically speaking, is the union boss.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.