No, I didn't make your point.
You inferred the GB stole his story line from Geller, that was a false accusation.
Does Pamela Geller cite every source she obtained those video's from, no she did not.
Your Pamela is guilty of the same things you accuse Glenn of.
I also gather you didn't accept my point of eating our own in front of noobs who might be here looking for some guidance only to be turned off by our petty criticisms of any given spokesman for our side.
Hell, we're not even debating the the merits of an issue but in stead we're focused on the messenger.
So be it, I think it's a big mistake and it does nothing to further the Conservative cause.
If you go back to her website, she not only shows her original source, you’ll find that the source responds in the Comments section to people questioning him.
She named the exact school where the documents came from. GB didn’t. GB just presented the documents in a generic way.
The parent of the involved student has his real name on the website. GB never mentioned him or the kid, for that matter.
P. Geller cited the names, and produced the documents they sent her; and then they consented to respond on her site. GB did none of these; he simply grabbed P. Geller’s documents off her site and presented the information as his own.
The reason we focus on the messenger, is that if the messenger is a fraud....perhaps so is the message.
And I think we concervatives should be concerned about tying ourselves to a fraud. Because he’ll take us down, too. He’s got NOTHING to lose.
Unwarranted conjunction. IMO, Beck is not attempting to 'further' the conservative cause; he is attempting to ride it like a wave, while winking to his other constituency.
Well said Ron.