Here’s the one topic I cited, in fact:
Now, go back and look at what he presented on TV the following week....WITHOUT ATTRIBUTION.
There are names and anything else you want to know, right there. And there is an additional update a day or so later, if I remember correctly.
Glenn Beck blatantly stole her story. Period. This is the reason that NO bloggers stick up for him. He steals their hard work. It’s no accident that GB has no friends in the blogosphere. His “fans” want to believe they don’t mention him because they are jealous of him. No, it’s because he takes the independent research and “scoops” of others and presents them as his own. The only reason they aren’t going after him now is because he is BIG and serving their purpose; he’s providing entertainment.
GB is not a traditional conservative. That is the point here....he is not self-reliant. Most days, he is a common thief, stealing the intellectual property of others. That’s what I am saying. That said, the one thing his staff did research, which was the whole Mao, Lenin, Marx etc thing, was well done. He’s entitled to take credit for that and should.
But when I see his show each day, most stuff I already knew. Because he’s grabbed it from others.
Sorry, hon.
Nice try, hon.
Furthermore, this blogger that you are using is using sources without recognition too.
Citing that socialist go after children is nothing new.
It was Hitler who said "give me the children and I'll rule the world"
Having video's of it on the Internet is the only thing that is new.