Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stephenjohnbanker

No, it’s apples and oranges. Not the same thing at all. DeMint has taken an active - and official - roll in promoting conservative candidates in primaries. So his purposefuly absence in this race is more meaningful than if Palin or Romney stayed neutral IMO (although I wish they both had). Your opinion may differ.


100 posted on 02/23/2010 9:58:06 AM PST by crunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: crunk

The issue with DeMint is that he hasn’t been shy about endorsing people he really wanted, so while his refusal to endorse McCain clearly indicates DeMint doesn’t find McCain a conservative, his refusal to endorse Hayworth would imply DeMint doesn’t think that highly of Hayworth either.

But I am willing to believe DeMint simply doesn’t want to waste an endorsement on an outsider against an incumbent that he can live with in the Senate — no point in burning every bridge.


114 posted on 02/23/2010 10:33:09 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: crunk

Of course, I can’t explain why DeMint endorsed Romney for President when others such as McCain were still in the race.

Still, the endorsement I understood the least in 2008 was Tom Coburn endorsing McCain.


116 posted on 02/23/2010 10:37:48 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson