You are right.
CONSERVATIVE gays would be focused on issues of personal liberties and privacy, besides the standard plate of financial responsibility and national security. I see no problem with their inclusion.
Demanding the gay agenda of goverenment recognition and promotion of their lifestyle in any form, from special rights and legal recognition of gay marriage to inclusion in school curiculum and sex education is the LIBERAL agenda and must be immediately denounced and expelled.
Yup
Conservatism would always have to be “relative” for active homosexuals. It would be virtually impossible for them to be of a single mind about how they are living, at the least. Questions would darkly hang.
“promotion of their lifestyle in any form, from special rights and legal recognition of gay marriage to inclusion in school curiculum and sex education is the LIBERAL agenda and must be immediately denounced and expelled.”
Hello? Two of the foundational planks of GOPride are to legalize male/male sodomite penetration as a ‘marriage’ and to protect open homosexual lifestyles in our military. I would not call those either mainstream or Conservative issues. They are straight up about liberal social engineering.
See post 29. Those who suppose homosexuals can be conservative have a strange idea of what conservatism requires, and those that assume that acceptance of homosexuality will enable even fiscal conservatism and small gov. do not understand its nature and effects.