Posted on 02/22/2010 6:16:07 PM PST by GeronL
I think the group or individual who purchased the website has been had by Mrs. Malkin. If she had any any idea what direction her website was going to be taken after its sale she knew it will go down in flames once the new owners start promoting the homosexual agenda. She can take the money she has made and simply create a new and better website if she chooses to do so.
No one is trying to make it illegal to be gay.
They want to FORCE this on elementary school age kids.
That is perverted to the nth degree.
bullet to the brain.
Most know homos who behave decently. The problem is the politicized homosexual, and their are many of them, pushing us to accept their perverse behavior. They push to brainwash our children. They push to criminalize speech critical of their behavior. That’s the discussion I hear here on FR about homos. If you get tired maybe you ought to go to sites that promote the perverse to refresh yourself.
The new owners are supposedly Christian.
I will say that when it comes to the agenda that is pushed by the pro-homosexual lobby I can certainly see where people would rightfully be upset.
As for the religous aspect, I can only say that in my faith we are called to love the sinner but hate the sin. For me, that is the complex part of this.
This is also why I love Freerepublic. I can't think of another place on the web where this kind of discussion could happen as freely or as honestly as it does right here on this website.
Abortions have been federally funded for decades.
Maybe you cede but perhaps you need to draw boundries and let those who are pushing on you KNOW your boundries.
Where is your Faith?
Or are you just having a Ive had enough of it kinda day?
If you aren’t fighting the “Gay” agenda then you are not a conservative, that is inescapable.
I have probably THOUSANDS of posts over the course of many years, I lurked for about 2-3 years before I joined.
How in the hell would I be a liberal troll. I’m not a social conservative, therefore we don’t agree but I reckon I’m more ‘right-wing’ than you are. Remember the ‘right’ was pro civil-rights before Truman took that football and ran with it for purely political reasons.
All men equal under the law. Individual rights and autonomy sovereign above fuzzy conceptions inherent to communitarianism.
We ALL judge, it’s just that there are things worth judging and those not.
I also repeatedly stated my opposition to many aspects of the ‘gay-left agenda.’ I just don’t think panicking about HotAir for OF ALL THINGS gay-related topics is the way to go.
Yeah..Allah has been a problem for some time. I detect some anti-Christian/ Andrew Sullivan type sentiment there. Especially when it comes to conservative women who mention their Christian faith. He’s ragged on Palin and Coulter. He’s not as overt as some, he uses what others say to attack them most times. Very catty guy.FYI, Allahpundit is an atheist.
What “high quality” individual practices and promotes anal sex with men as normal and natural?
No but you’re a moron.
Glad I could act as ether-flypaper for all the people who are INCREDIBLY focus on homosexuals as opposed to minimal government, individual rights, right of self-defense and life and defeating COLLECTIVIST and COMMUNITARIAN impositions.
methinks we has a zotz at #72
I thought it was horrible when they stopped allowing schools to have homecooked meals in the cafaterias.
EWTN is discussing sex ed in the schools right now. Abundant Life.
How much did Malkin get paid for “HotAir”? The purchaser is a public company so it MUST be disclosed at some point.
When I was in school, the food itself was felonious.
its not a focus on gays.
are you dense.
Its what the SCHOOLS are going to LITTLE CHILDREN that I have been on about.
doing
Big deal.
How in the hell would I be a liberal troll. I’m not a social conservative, therefore we don’t agree but I reckon I’m more ‘right-wing’ than you are.
Non sequitur par excellence. Social conservatism is part and parcel of being "right wing"...unless of course you want to paraphrase the line from Chesterton, and say that "Christianity and gay rights are very similar, especially gay rights."
Remember the ‘right’ was pro civil-rights before Truman took that football and ran with it for purely political reasons.
Yeah, you are a leftist: attempting to confuse people's minds by linking "civil rights" with "gay rights" -- as though the legacy of slavery based on the melanin content of one's skin was remotely related to freely chosen sexual perversion.
All men equal under the law. Individual rights and autonomy sovereign above fuzzy conceptions inherent to communitarianism.
Or as Dubya said when asked about the homosexual movement (compared to his own alcohol problems in the past) "We are all sinners."
But if you loudly declaim your sin as a RIGHT, then that does not constitute repentance, does it?
We ALL judge, it’s just that there are things worth judging and those not.
Not looking too conversant with Christianity, are you?
"Judge not, that you be not judged."
The idea is to condemn the behaviour and save the soul put in peril BY that behaviour.
I also repeatedly stated my opposition to many aspects of the ‘gay-left agenda.’ I just don’t think panicking about HotAir for OF ALL THINGS gay-related topics is the way to go.
Does the word "Gramscian infiltration" ring a bell? See also the seeding of homosexuals into the Catholic clergy.
Cheers!
good question. I hope she made off like a bandit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.