Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Nuclear Option
Investors.com ^ | February 22, 2010 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY Staff

Posted on 02/22/2010 4:33:54 PM PST by Kaslin

Abuse Of Power: The White House has threatened to ram through radical health reform by abusing the budget reconciliation process. That would mean a new chapter on corruption for the history books.

White House communications director Dan Pfeiffer told reporters Monday that Democrats, ignoring the will of the American people, will try to pass a big government health reform bill through the "nuclear option" of reconciliation. In so doing, they'd be circumventing a Republican filibuster in the Senate and need only 51 votes.

In response, House Minority Leader John Boehner said the president had "crippled the credibility" of the health "summit" planned for Thursday "by proposing the same massive government takeover of health care based on a partisan bill the American people have already rejected."

He said the bill "doubles down on the same failed approach that will drive up premiums, destroy jobs, raise taxes and slash Medicare benefits" and called the meeting "a Democratic infomercial."

"Using reconciliation," Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell charged last week, "would be an acknowledgment that there is bipartisan opposition to their bill."

But it would actually be something far more arrogant. The reconciliation procedure was hatched out of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to limit filibustering on budget bills — in other words, to prevent fiscally conscious senators from curbing Congress' big spending ways.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/22/2010 4:33:54 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I think all of that is irrelevant. After today, BO knows that he now has a “handful” of GOobers, including Scott Brown, who will help him ram KenyanCare down the throats of Americans.


2 posted on 02/22/2010 4:40:54 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (If the CIA and NASA are going to "monitor climate change", why the hell do we need the EPA?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Free radicals in our political system, out of control and addicted to spending.


3 posted on 02/22/2010 4:42:49 PM PST by FreedBird (S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gerold Ford (R) had just followed Nixon but, and this is important, the Dems controlled both the US House Carl Abbot (D) and the US Seante Mike Mansfield (D) in 1974.


4 posted on 02/22/2010 4:44:48 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

I disagree that Scott Brown will vote for the health care bill, and I know what you are thinking of


5 posted on 02/22/2010 4:49:23 PM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for Obama: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

At this point, any “conservative” who isn’t willing to talk openly and LOUDLY about secession and reorganization will be shown to be a TRAITOR and/or a COWARD.

Under a secession and reorganization plan, a number of states secede and then re-assemble under the U.S. Constitution as the Reorganized United States of America. All U.S. states would be invited to join - and most would.

The R-USA would have no obligation to pay the unconstitutionally acquired debts of old USA.


6 posted on 02/22/2010 4:50:13 PM PST by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I really wish they would go nuclear for two reasons:

1. It would antagonize the public more leading to more resistance.

2. It would justify majority rule in January of 2011 with Republican majorities.

If mere majorities are needed, in 2011 Republicans could begin in earnest repealing almost everything Obama has done.


7 posted on 02/22/2010 4:53:30 PM PST by lonestar67 ("I love my country a lot more than I love politics," President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

That is absolute nonsense. The entire GOP caucus will hold firm in both chambers.

The votes today by Snowe, Collins, Bond, Voinovich, and Brown GUARANTEE their opposition to BOcare... They want to be seen as free agents, always reasonable in their approach.

Moreover, the GOP leadership did not want the cloture bill to fail today - Reid’s win means that the MSM cannot peddle their “DC is broken” campaign now. Thus it is now easier for every GOP member of Congress to vote NO on BOcare.


8 posted on 02/22/2010 4:54:01 PM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

After today, BO knows that he now has a “handful” of GOobers, including Scott Brown,

Has the Massachusetts miracle turned out to be a nightmare!??


9 posted on 02/22/2010 4:54:54 PM PST by timetostand (Ya say ya wanna revolution -- OK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lonestar67
If mere majorities are needed, in 2011 Republicans could begin in earnest repealing almost everything Obama has done. I wish that were true. However, if the Republicans tried to repeal Obamacare in 2011 with a simple majority, Obama would just veto the bill.
10 posted on 02/22/2010 4:58:53 PM PST by arista
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
OBAMANOMICS--TRICKLE DOWN DESTRUCTION of the economy

SET THEIR LOCAL AND DC LINES ON FIRE!

Sen. Scot Brown's number is 202-224-5443

Capitol Hill switchboard is 202-224-3121

Lots of local demwit phone numbers on this thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2408217/posts

Rename, repackage, rewrite it a tad smaller, and sell another pig in a poke.

Tennessee has joined several other states in trying to pass a Health Care Freedom Act. NO COLAs for granny, retired Military or retired fed employees. BIG NEW fees for Tricare for Life retired over 65 Military's secondary health ins. (DOD bill already passed, delayed but goes into effect 2011)

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w/

New Dem mantra: Woof, woof eat dog food granny....ala let them eat cake.

OBAMA’s WAR ON SENIORS

Friday, February 19, 2010

Obama says slight fix will extend Social Security

http://townhall.com/news/us/2010/02/19/obama_says_slight_fix_will_extend_social_security

Health Care Rationing for Seniors Another Problem in New Obama Plan

http://www.lifenews.com/bio3058.html

Socialized Med Thread

TRI CARE FOR LIFE This from a google search:

http://economicspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/05/tricare-for-life-is-obama-trying-to.html

This option would help reduce the costs of TFL, as well as costs for Medicare, by introducing minimum out-of pocket requirements for beneficiaries. Under this option, TFL would not cover any of the first $525 of an enrollee’s cost-sharing liabilities for calendar year 2011 and would limit coverage to 50 percent of the next $4,725 in Medicare cost sharing that the beneficiary incurred. (Because all further cost sharing would be covered by TFL, enrollees could not pay more than $2,888 in cost sharing in that year.)

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9925/12-18-HealthOptions.pdf

http://www.vawatchdog.org/09/hcva09/hcva110609-1.htm

Bill Would Restrict Veterans’ Health Care Options 11/06/09

Buyer and McKeon Offer Amendments to Protect Veterans and TRICARE Beneficiaries

Congress plans to block Tricare fee increases
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w

By Rick Maze - Staff writer, Oct 7, 2009

Tricare fee increases imposed last week by the Defense Department will be repealed by a provision of the compromise 2010 defense authorization bill unveiled Wednesday by House and Senate negotiators.

Snip

The fee increases were announced on Sept. 30 and took effect on Oct. 1, but the defense bill, HR 2647, includes a provision barring any fee increases until the start of fiscal 2011.

Snip

Retired Army Maj. Gen. Bill Matz, president of the National Association for Uniformed Services, said the announcement of fee increases was shocking considering that the Obama administration promised earlier this year to hold off on any new fee Tricare fee increases until fiscal 2011.

“President Obama and DoD assured NAUS and the entire military family earlier this year that there would rightly be no increases in any Tricare fees” in fiscal 2010, Matz said. “We took them at their word, and I can’t believe that a co-pay increase like this was allowed to go forward,” he added.

Bambi doesn't keep his promises...so buyer beware.

11 posted on 02/22/2010 5:04:01 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

I agree! Reid screwed up big time by giving some of the RINO senators an easy out by letting them vote for this “tiny” jobs bill.


12 posted on 02/22/2010 5:23:52 PM PST by MrDem (Founder: Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Among other things, it’s a tax scheme to rip the upper middle class down to starve with the rest of us in peasantry. Many will lose their employee insurance packages. Many others will lose their jobs. Despots. Their assumption is that if the upper middle class falls, they will vote Democrat from then on.


13 posted on 02/22/2010 5:49:01 PM PST by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Any thought on military pensions? If the R-USA has any chance of getting active duty military, they’d have to consider covering it.


14 posted on 02/22/2010 6:48:44 PM PST by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
Any thought on military pensions? If the R-USA has any chance of getting active duty military, they’d have to consider covering it.

The R-USA certainly would cover those kinds of perfectly Constitutional obligations. But there is no need to pay the debts acquired by doing things outside the Constitutional authority of the federal government.
15 posted on 02/22/2010 6:53:46 PM PST by USALiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson