That thread was about how Brown was discussing his position wrt to killing unborn babies. Sure, he said he was against partial-birth abortions, as if killing a baby in the womb is less harmful to the baby than killing it as it emerges. You seem to think his taking this position is akin to a soldier falling on a grenade to save his squad.
This thread is about Brown taking choosing to expand the federal government only a little bit, instead of a lot.
Which is the same as going over the cliff at 70mph instead of 90mph.
Where is the Brown who stands up to demoCRAPs in favor of the US taxpayer instead of standing hand-in-hand with them and singing Kumbayah?
BRAVO! Lobster for you my friend.
True, but stopping the killing isn't on the Senate agenda this year, and it won't be on the Senate agenda until a) the Supreme Court tells them it's okay again, and b) a leadership like the one Scott Brown will vote for is elected to take over the Senate.
Funding all that killing, which pro-aborts estimate would bring in 300,000 additional clients for killings per year, is very much on the Senate's agenda and Brown's entire campaign was a promise to cast the deciding vote against that one bill.