[DJ MacWoW]

Foreign influence could be money, family,

Out of your own mouth.

Refute Professor Yinger using historical papers as he did to form his treatise.

They tried to oust Arthur. He also burned all his papers just before his death. Imagine that.

[EnderWiggins]

"They tried to oust Arthur. He also burned all his papers just before his death. Imagine that. "

LOL... They tried to disqualify him in 1880. He burned the papers after he had completely finished his term in 1886.

Didn't seem he was very concerned about anything in those papers keeping him out of office.

[parsifal]

AND, you focus in on one thing that it COULD be, and ignore all the other things which make the “most direct evidence” pretty un-direct, and then, after extracting that one thread, you wing it to Legal Theory Land, and without a trial, a decision, arguments pro and con, anything at all, you decide that what Pinckney COULD have meant by his statement, backs up your legal theory.

(And like you said before, you don’t listen to what famous people say? You may be right on that one!)

Like I have said before, the birthers self generate facts, evidence, and NOT legal theories, BUT INSTEAD legal CONCLUSIONS, and then work themselves into a lather over it.

parsy, who says there are better ways to entertain yourselves