Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tobyhill

I didn’t see the story but am familiar with the technology.

First, the commercial box produces enough electricity to run dozens of households.

Second, the fuel cell is only part of the entire unit. There are additional components to deal with fuel conditioning and delivery and another set of components to deal with heat management. Fuel cells produce DC current so there is going to be an inverter and additional electrical components.


45 posted on 02/22/2010 5:40:31 AM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: dangerdoc
Having a generator on location would indeed save transmission losses from a central generator plant. Economies of scale come in there though. The bottom line is inescapable thermodynamics. You don't get something for nothing. Efficiency may increase, but any "heat engine" has limits. Thermodynamics says, "You can't win, you can't break even, and you can't get out of the game".

Nuclear power is the only long term viable option.

51 posted on 02/22/2010 5:48:16 AM PST by Huebolt (Democrat = (national socialist) = NAZI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson