You ae wrong on that one sir. I have heard him many times say he disagrees with several of the "planks" of the LP. He simply aligned himself with the LP because it is the closest party we have that is more committed to smaller government than the other two. He has said he would align himself to the party that lives up to a smaller government ideals rather than ones that give us lip service.
I also must have missed the "gratuitous" attack on Cheney in the speech but I'll go back and review it again.
As far as the LP being responsible for giving us Ried, no the voters are the ultimate failure, but then again Ensign has really showed himself to be committed to his promises, now hasn't he?
Thanks. I missed that. He ever say the LP is just as responsible as Democrats and Republicans?
He simply aligned himself with the LP because it is the closest party we have that is more committed to smaller government than the other two.
They say that. I've seen no evidence they've done anything to achieve that. I do see evidence they have used their position much in the same way the ACLU has used the constitution.
As far as the LP being responsible for giving us Reid, no the voters are the ultimate failure, but then again Ensign has really showed himself to be committed to his promises, now hasn't he?
The LP was responsible. The attacks were vicious. And that was 12 years ago. Ensign was with the LP on nearly all the issues. No one could make the negative comment you just did in 1998. All anyone knew was his House record and what he said. But even if anyone did know, he would still have been better than Harry Reid.