When did that change? Are they maybe getting dumb people to confuse carbon DIoxide with carbon MONoxide?
It changed when this moron, and all his followers who've never taken a science class, came along.
Ernest........this seems a good thread to pose a question. When I was a kid, CO2 was GOOD for us because trees and plants thrive on it and in return, give us the oxygen WE thrive on.
When did that change? Are they maybe getting dumb people to confuse carbon DIoxide with carbon MONoxide?
The question sounds simplistic, but I still can’t find the answer.
While we’re asking questions I want to know if Ernest_at_the_Beach needs to be looking at property in Arizona as a result of the record snow fall melting around the globe? Why not?
Get Carbon associated with carbon fuels ...then get CO2 associated with carbon fuels...
Then get the carbon Tax trading scheming going...whoola...money to be made...Bankers like it....Politicians continue to work on it!
Folks, understand this entire global warming nonsense is being driven by Goldman Sacks. GS is a broker - they make money brokering things. The more things there are to broker, the more money GS makes. They put on their thinking caps and came up with the idea of brokering “carbon credits” to the tune of billions of dollars every year. Just look at the European carbon credit brokers and you can see what’s it’s about. If they get away with this, they will think of other things to “broker.” GS has WAY too much influence in the world and in our own government - look at the histories of major government players and they are all connected, in one way or the other, to GS.
When did that change? Are they maybe getting dumb people to confuse carbon DIoxide with carbon MONoxide?
It changed when this moron, and all his followers who've never taken a science class, came along.
It’s simple. Getting control of CO2 is getting control of everything. It is the totalitarian bureaucratic panacea.