Note: To date, the concept of man-made CO2 emissions causing global warming remains theory only. There exists no empirical evidence to support the theory.
Nope. Not true. The "smoking gun" chlorine radical was detected and measured in the atmosphere years ago. However, that does zip to validate global warming, which IS only theory.
http://www.chemheritage.org/EducationalServices/faces/env/readings/solomon.htm
“Dr. Solomon had used computer models to study the chemistry of the atmosphere. Now her work was about to become as hands-on as it gets. Working from McMurdo Base, Antarctica, she measured how the air above the frozen south absorbed the moonlight of the long polar night. Handling the cold in stride like a true Chicagoan (her right eyelid once froze shut while collecting data outdoors), she was able to detect high levels of chlorine oxide (ClO) in the stratosphere.”
“In a 1987 expedition, high-flying airplanes collected more data showing chlorine oxide in great abundance over Antarctica. This convinced most scientists that the reaction mechanism of Molina’s theories was causing the ozone loss, rather than natural causes.”
The writer is correct that the CFC was a dry run on the Global Warming scam. It was based on the flimsiest of evidence. Didn’t help much that Dow’s patent on the CFCs in question was expiring, and that they had a new patented replacement in the chutes just in time for it.
later