Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/21/2010 7:35:49 AM PST by ChessExpert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ChessExpert
"...A frequent question posed by the opponents of this policy was where are the doctors in this debate..."

They are all working...

2 posted on 02/21/2010 7:44:41 AM PST by rlmorel (We are traveling "The Road to Serfdom".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChessExpert
My doctor informed me that he is for Obamacare. I am looking for a new doctor, I no longer trust his judgment. If anyone in Houston has an Internist that they would like to recommend I am taking suggestions.
3 posted on 02/21/2010 7:50:20 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChessExpert
It was assumed that the American Medical Association (AMA) provided the platform for doctors to air their views. It came as a shock to most people when it was revealed that this was not the case, and in fact, only 17% of all doctors were members.

Only 17% of doctors are in the AMA. Wow.

It is easy to assume that the AMA IS American medicine. I suppose that is like assuming that NOW is the actually the national association of women - not just in name, but in fact. I read once that the Concerned Women for America has far more members than NOW. It's a conservative women's group: http://www.cwfa.org .

There are medical associations other than the AMA. I read the accusation that the AMA came to dominance after they and the pharmaceutical companies cozied up to one another, and this marriage leads to suboptimal health maintenance and care today. Aside from that, I believe that large loves large. Big business, big medicine, big labor, even big religion, all get along with big government and vice versa. It works out well for the leadership. It does not work out so well for the rank and file. Unaffiliated individuals really get screwed.

8 posted on 02/21/2010 9:21:16 AM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress. What is it today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ChessExpert
Here's something from the article that I would like to understand better:

To compound the problem, the AMA betrayed the very people that it was ostensibly meant to represent. This was to protect its $100M medical coding franchise that the federal government grants the AMA as the basis by which doctors and hospitals get by paid insurance companies and the federal government -- a major incentive for the group to endorse state-run medicine. (emphasis added)

Can anyone explain the "$100M medical coding franchise that the federal government grants the AMA"?

14 posted on 02/21/2010 6:48:47 PM PST by ChessExpert (The unemployment rate was 4.5% when Democrats took control of Congress. What is it today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson