Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Ron Paul wrote, sponsored, and fought for the Sanctity of Life Act, which would have allowed states to ban abortion.

Allowing states to ban abortion is a massive improvement over the current situation, which doesn't allow such a ban at state or federal level.

561 posted on 02/21/2010 12:56:58 PM PST by Rich Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 548 | View Replies ]


To: Rich Knight; xzins; P-Marlowe; EternalVigilance; Lesforlife; Coleus; narses; BykrBayb; ...
Ron Paul wrote, sponsored, and fought for the Sanctity of Life Act, which would have allowed states to ban abortion.

Yes, and it would have also allowed states to keep abortion legal. In other words, he is pro-choice.

Allowing states to ban abortion is a massive improvement over the current situation, which doesn't allow such a ban at state or federal level.

No, it refuses to acknowledge that unborn babies are HUMAN BEINGS who have RIGHTS. As far as reducing the number of abortions, just as many babies will be murdered, it will just happen in fewer states.

564 posted on 02/21/2010 1:10:38 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies ]

To: Rich Knight

Human rights trump states rights!

No state has the authority to “allow” innocent babies to
be slaughtered.

5th and 14th amendments state that none shall be deprived of life, liberty
or property without due process of law.


603 posted on 02/21/2010 5:07:01 PM PST by Lesforlife ("For you created my inmost being; you knit me together in my mother's womb . . ." Psalm 139:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson