Skip to comments.
Gay Republicans draw support, concern at CPAC
(State-controlled) CNN.com ^
| February 19, 2010
| Brianna Keilar
Posted on 02/20/2010 12:36:18 PM PST by USALiberty
An unlikely sponsor at this year's annual conservative conference is hoping to not only promote the issues that set it apart from many Republicans, but also draw attention to the beliefs they share.
The group is called GOProud -- a name that combines GOP and gay pride. So far, the group is getting a mixed response at the Conservative Political Action Conference.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cpac; cpac2010; fudgepac; gays; goproud; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: gidget7
They may be Republican, but they are NOT Conservative, and do not belong a CPAC
They are "Republican" the way John McCain is "Republican." They are IN NO WAY conservative.
To: little jeremiah
Alinsky would be proud too...
22
posted on
02/20/2010 12:56:03 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
I have a quote somewhere in my files (can’t find it right this minute as my computer is all disorganized from several problems, now fixed) from Thomas Jefferson, saying something to the tune of the more he reads, the more he sees that the basic moral principles as espoused in all relgions are what civilizations should be based upon. Not stated excatly but more or less that’s what he said. That’s what got me started on the Moral Absolutes Ping list, IIRC.
23
posted on
02/20/2010 12:57:09 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: little jeremiah
Well, they need to be answered smartly when they saunter into something like CPAC, and made clear that this is not welcome. Let them know too that if their feewings are hurt, they can call us homophobic all they want, but we will not budge just because they called us a name.
24
posted on
02/20/2010 12:59:00 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: USALiberty
Even John McCain is more “Republican” than the GOQueers.
25
posted on
02/20/2010 12:59:56 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: little jeremiah
the basic moral principles as espoused in all religions are what civilizations should be based upon.
No. God is not religiously neutral and we should not be religiously neutral either. This is a Christian nation founded upon the bedrock of God's Holy Word. We stray from that at our peril. Sure, we can and should tolerate most other religions (but you can't convince me that Islam really IS a religion). But our laws should reflect our Christian heritage and be aligned with the Laws of God as much as we can make them.
To: USALiberty
27
posted on
02/20/2010 1:01:38 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Presidential charisma without repect for liberty is a dangerous trait.)
To: TADSLOS
28
posted on
02/20/2010 1:02:58 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: USALiberty
I have no problem with that, since the Judeo Christian morality and values were the founding of this country. But what Jefferson was referring to is that amazingly enough (or not), all basic moral absolutes are essentially the same in all monotheist religions, and I include Hinduism since it is actually monotheistic. Even Buddhism, which is more a philosophy than an actual religion, espouses the same moral absolutes - did you know the Dalai Lama considers homosexuality unnatural and is against same sex marriage?
Even Islam, as much as I loathe it, has in principle, the same moral values. Leaving aside polygamy, but that is extant in the OT as well.
29
posted on
02/20/2010 1:07:25 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: little jeremiah
Now this plank is where I have some problems. We don't need government getting involved in "domestic benefits." Just because I don't care what they do in their homes, does not mean I support paying for it with my tax money.
As far as global extremists goes, I'm generally less-interventionist in foreign policy, and would like to see a return to supporting America first.
30
posted on
02/20/2010 1:08:19 PM PST
by
Darren McCarty
(I don't look for leaders. I follow my own path, my way.)
To: TADSLOS
Foul United Depraved Gender-Exceptioned Political Action Committee
31
posted on
02/20/2010 1:09:20 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
You notice how the “gay” agenda is really gathering steam. 0bama wants to push it hard since he knows he’ll either be out before his term is up, or at the end of this one at the latest. So all the foot soldiers as well as “big guys” are pushing pushing pushing.
They need to be put in their place and given no quarter.
32
posted on
02/20/2010 1:09:26 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: HiTech RedNeck
33
posted on
02/20/2010 1:09:52 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Tea Party. We are the party of NO!)
To: Darren McCarty
How about the “gay marriage” one and repeal of DADT? Don’t those bother you?
34
posted on
02/20/2010 1:10:30 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: little jeremiah
35
posted on
02/20/2010 1:12:10 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: little jeremiah
Well, they stuck the narrow end of their wedge where it is not going to be tolerated this time.
36
posted on
02/20/2010 1:14:54 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: little jeremiah
Gay marriage is already banned in my state and it is an issue that should be left to the states as the original intent of the 10th Amendment. I don't live in Vermont, so it isn't my business what goes on there. We banned it 60-40% here, and I was part of the 60%.
I didn't serve in the military, so I don't have an opinion on Don't ask, don't tell. That's something the military should decide, not politicians.
37
posted on
02/20/2010 1:31:09 PM PST
by
Darren McCarty
(I don't look for leaders. I follow my own path, my way.)
To: Darren McCarty
The head generals who don’t live in barracks and have never been on a battlefield? Because some of them are for it.
Anyone who is concerned about the morale of the military should have an opinion of DADT. They protect us and deserve our support in every way. And the majority of the military do NOT want homosexuals in the military.
38
posted on
02/20/2010 1:35:04 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: Darren McCarty
Same sex marriage is causing legal problems already between states. So that’s a sort of copout answer too.
39
posted on
02/20/2010 1:36:00 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: HiTech RedNeck
It’s gathering like a ripe boil.
Which is apparently what needs to happen to resolve the whole mess.
40
posted on
02/20/2010 1:44:56 PM PST
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson