I detect a bit of "swagger."
Posted on 02/20/2010 9:16:59 AM PST by Left Blue NJ for Red SC
Whatever she did was bad enough.
I detect a bit of "swagger."
If we really wanted to stop dead-in-the-tracks things like the Duke Lacross false-accusations we’d have the penalty for lying under oath to get another party blamed have the penalty of what ever penalty would have applied to the innocents would be applied instead to the perjurer.
Ex: Suppose the Duke case had been about murder and the possible penalties were death or life-in-prison. Crystal would then, having falsely accused, have to either spend life in prison or be put to death.
Who was the idiot DA that treated this woman as though she was a victim?
There it is ... Nifong. (pffft)
Paging Je$$ie HiJack$0n and the un reverend Al $harpton, the NOW Hags/liars and the leftie Liar Mediots of the MSM, this poor picked on criminal needs your help again.
Of course this has to be Bush’s fault, still.
Mike Nifong.
If she ever stuck her face to a pane of glass, she’d need the fire department to break the suction. Kinda like those “Garfield” thingeys you used to see on car windows.
Bijon Robinson (center) was among 200 people who met yesterday with UCSD officials to express outrage over recent portrayals of black culture.
Marc Balanky / Union-Tribune
New UCSD racial incident sparks rage, confrontation
Minority students at the University of California San Diego declared a racial state of emergency yesterday, presenting administrators with a list of 32 demands — many of which the ...
http://www.signonsandiego.com/
Very smug looking, the woman has some real issues and shouldn’t be walking the streets much less raising 3 children. Poor kids.
To be fair (although that’s an overused word), one would have to make sure the penalty is only reversed when the accuser can be demonstrated to have willfully made up the allegation.
What I mean is this: In any case, a “not guilty” should not automatically equate to “false accusation”. In a case such as the Duke Lacrosse team, the unraveling of the story by the actual evidence - which was complete and unequivocal - should be used as the catalyst for pursuit of “false accusation” penalties. In a he-said/she-said case, where the evidence is ambiguous and conviction or acquittal rests on the perception of honesty of those testifying, the false accusation card should be out of play (and must be CLEARLY so).
Just my $.02.
She’s killed fewer people than dead Ted.
Wait a minute, maybe she is a Tea Bagger.....yes, thats the spin, its always the answer to any violence, use the tea thing.
3 guys falsely accused X 40yrs each (http://www.ncsu.edu/police/Information/NCLaw.html) = 120yrs for her ........ works for me
If true, I can see why they were upset. On the other hand, how many times have we seen something like this not be true or blown way out of proportion.
I detect being higher than a kite.
MUST READ:
http://s1.zetaboards.com/Liestoppers_meeting/topic/2953076/1/
The LS (LieStoppers) Listening Statement; (for Truth Detector)
Re:
http://johnsville.blogspot.com/2006/11/duke-case-listening-statement.html
Friday, November 10, 2006
Duke Case: The ‘listening’ statement
photo of ‘listening statement’ ad. in Duke Chronicle, April 6th, 2006
Updated: Within hours of this post, the Duke African & African American Studies Department pulled the ‘listening statement’ (.pdf) file off their website.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
