Exit line forms on the left.
We can’t stop the advance of the homosexual agenda unless we maintain political power. And I don’t see us winning elections as a party if the party is perceived as acting out of personal animus toward gay people.
And I think that to the degree the party looks like it is acting out of personal animus, the logical arguments against the homosexual agenda will suffer. We can support our opposition against the agenda without resorting to an argument from personal animus, and I think that is a winning argument.
I’m sorry if you think that somehow supports the homosexual agenda. My goal is to oppose the agenda, and to keep the country from falling further into an embrace of cultural perversion. I just think that on the political front, that fight is best engaged if we actually win elections.
I know some people don’t distinguish the political from the personal. Maybe I’m not making that distinction clear, and maybe it wasn’t clear that the “we” I was talking about was the political party (although I said political party in the same sentence).
It is my job to oppose sin in all it’s forms, and to speak against it. I want my political party to promote good things, and to oppose bad things, but I don’t want it to become an arm of the church. The fight is on multiple fronts.