Simply read your reply in the context of the discussion.
Having a homesexual friend does not, repeat, does not mean you, or Ronald Reagan embraces a homosexual agenda.
I do not embrace a homosexual agenda, nor do I think some of the other poster here do either.
I simply don’t care to have you tell me what I can do with my life, any more than I want Obama, or Pelosi, or Reid or anyone else to tell me what I can do.
If “conservative” gays push things I am opposed to such as Nambla, gay marriage, etc., then I will push back. But until such, I will fight for their right to do what they want in private.
It’s too late. The gay army has already passed you by and moved on, norge. You’re foolishly looking toward the wrong horizon for hostile intent.
Read the story as it unfolded at CPAC. An invited traditional conservative speaker (I can’t believe we have to almost hyphenate conservative these days) was shouted down by the GOPride and maybe others to the point of no free speech for this invited speaker. What more needs to be explained or defended to true-conservatives (here we go again, hyphenation)? Tolerance is only one way with “gays”. They can show their intolerance for you and your values but, no way, no how are you to show any intolerance of their perverted, damaging & progressive agenda.
Anyone calling themselves “conservative” should know what a “conservative” is.
Lord willing, constitutional-conservatives birthed from the Tea Parties can claim the title and definition as “conservatives” for years to come.