Ryan Sorba booed off CPAC stage for anti-homosexual remarks

Right Pundits ^ | Feb 19, 2010 | Donald Borsch Jr.

[DesertRenegade]

Ryan Sorba, from the Young Americans for Freedom organization’s California chapter, was booed off the stage tonight at CPAC, for deriding CPAC’s choice to have GOProud attend CPAC, even going so far as to say he “condemns CPAC”. Not the sort of thing one would say when invited to speak at the biggest gathering of Conservatives who look to CPAC for guidance and networking.

[scripter]

Regarding After the Ball... check this PDF document out: http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resources/8142838.pdf

little jeremiah posted some of the highlights here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1147428/posts?page=10#10

[wizard1961]

” If you think otherwise you should rethink what it means to be a conservative and posting on a conservative site.”

Oh yeah? Well, if you disagree with ME then YOU should rethink what it means to be a conservative!

So there.

[carolina71]

Agree.

Watch out ~ the disturbed one’s will be after you.

[xsmommy]

please define hate as you are using it here. i want to know how i can NOT be hateful, yet can pray for their souls, disapprove of their lifestyle and work to insure that traditional marriage prevails? a leftist would say i am a hater, what say you?

[pillut48]

It wasn't mentioned by Horowitz himself, but on one of the blogs on his "NewsReal" site. It will be interesting to see if he distances himself from the anti-conservative message there.

[wagglebee]

Oh yeah? Well, if you disagree with ME then YOU should rethink what it means to be a conservative!

So there.

Actually, it is YOU that have no idea what it means to be a conservative, you are a leftist RINO troll!

Jim Robinson is very clear on this issue:

Ryan Sorba booed off CPAC stage for anti-homosexual remarks

Saturday, February 20, 2010 12:29:45 AM · 211 of 765
Jim Robinson to Feline_AIDS; All

I’ll tell you what. Those of you who are defending the homosexual agenda are on the wrong website. Free Republic is a pro-God, pro-family, pro-Liberty conservative site! We are 100% opposed to liberalism, socialism, wacko environmentalism and militant homosexualism. If you don’t like it you can take a hike or get banned for trolling! Either way, I want no part of it on FR!!

CPAC may have surrendered to homosexualism, but I haven’t.

Never give in, never give up and never surrender!!

The exit line forms on the left.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies

[Jim Robinson]

You are starting to sound like you are defending the homosexual agenda. If so, you’re on the wrong website. I see lightening bolts in your near future.

[pillut48]

To you, that comment constitutes “hate”???

How do you feel if someone doesn’t like the color of your shirt? Is that hate speech as well???

[wizard1961]

“please define hate as you are using it here. i want to know how i can NOT be hateful, yet can pray for their souls, disapprove of their lifestyle and work to insure that traditional marriage prevails? a leftist would say i am a hater, what say you?”

Nothing there is hateful. This is hateful:

“Jeff Frazee, guess what, you just made an enemy out of me, buddy. Yeah you, guess what. YOU just made an enemy out of me...”

As a private citizen, I have a variety of opinions on right & wrong.

When talking about government & elections, I want to stop activist judges from running wild. I want to encourage people to vote to protect the definition of marriage. But, I welcome ANYONE who sincerely wants to restore the COTUS. If we can get back to the framers definition, issues like abortion & family values can be addressed... but without getting this FIRST we will not be able to make much progress.

Do you think the last 40 years have been pretty good for conservatism? I don’t.

First things first.

Thank you for your good question.

[trisham]

So, you’re saying that Jeff Frazee is hateful?

[daniel1212]

Thanks for the link, from back in the day when conservatism meant something more morally substantive, even as it yet had to progress in some ways. Below is from a man whose influenced liberals would like to remove from our laws.

In Book the Fourth, Chapter the Fifteenth, “Of Offences Against the Persons of Individuals,” Blackstone stated:

IV. WHAT has been here observed..., which ought to be the more clear in proportion as the crime is the more detestable, may be applied to another offence, of a still deeper malignity; the infamous crime against nature, committed either with man or beast.... But it is an offence of so dark a nature...that the accusation should be clearly made out....

In what is now the most liberal State:

Massachusetts General Laws:
CRIMES, PUNISHMENTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN CRIMINAL CASES
TITLE I.
CRIMES AND PUNISHMENTS
CHAPTER 272.
Section 34: Crime against nature

Whoever commits the abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with a beast, shall be punished by imprisonment in the state prison for not more than twenty years.

http://peacebyjesus.witnesstoday.org/Mass.Gen.Laws.html

May God grant repentance unto all.

[little jeremiah]

Did you read the GOProud’s agenda? Read it. It isn’t conervative and isn’t about smaller government. They don’t support the Constitution.

[trisham]

Too bad you seem to think there is a monolithic ‘homo’ community , and that part of that community has invaded the GOP in a Trojan Horse. It is precisely THIS attitude that turns gays into obnoxious militants that parade around pushing their butts in everyone’s faces, like at the Gay Pride Parades. You seem to be OK with continuing on with your part of this polarization. You’ll get what you deserve.

************************

Are you serious?

[carolina71]

“Several studies have shown that active homosexuals actually consume a significant amount of . . . .. .. “

You are so twisted about gays that you have to post this to garner attention hoping to scare everyone to your side when all you’re doing shock posting to garner our contempt for fellow men and women.

I’m sure you find pleasure in that.

What a f’in loser.

[little jeremiah]

Note his comments. “Reagan never hated”.

So opposition to the homosexual agenda = “hatred”. You’ve said this about 15 times today.

[xzins]

To: wizard1961 You are starting to sound like you are defending the homosexual agenda. If so, you’re on the wrong website. I see lightening bolts in your near future. 767 posted on Saturday, February 20, 2010 5:37:39 PM by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)

IBTZ!

[vox_freedom]

I never told anyone to shut up. Why do you misrepresent my words?

You are a definitely a piece of work.
My question to you was, (quoting directly from my post here):

"So you want candidates, elected leaders, and FR posters to just shut up about these issues?"

In case you couldn't tell, that was a question. Notice the question mark?

Instead you take pretend to take affront and say you "...never told anyone to shut up."

Huh?

Let me restate another question to you.
Since you didn't like Ryan Sorba telling it like it is to the homosexual activists at CPAC, did you want him to "shut up" or just be quiet?

And a second question.
Why do you hate conservative viewpoints being expressed about homosexual activism issues? You know, issues such as:"Don't ask, don't tell," abortion, homosexual marriage, "gay" adoption, being judgmental about homosexual teachings promoted in public schools, etc., etc.

[little jeremiah]

The disturbed one’s what? What item belonging to the disturbed one will be after him?

BTW, now that the GOProud’s agenda has been posted, do you agree with all their points or not? Please be specific.

[wagglebee]

In deference to Jim I think the phrase “starting to sound” was entirely too kind!