Yeah, that's the ticket. Saying that the "science is settled" makes it settled. Let's dispense with minor items such as data, evidence, proof, consensus, and the scientific method.
BTW, that's a derogatory reference to an individual with an advanced degree who works in a government administrative position.
Sure seems to fit EPA though.
I think what they are trying to say is that the science was settled long before it was unsettled.
“Saying that the “science is settled” makes it settled. Let’s dispense with minor items such as data, evidence, proof, consensus, and the scientific method.”
This could make one really interesting Daubert hearing. I want a seat for the fireworks if it gets that far.