Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
Haven’t you ever heard of the Boston Massacre? The soldiers on trial were defended by John Adams, who did such a good job at the defense that he secured acquittals.

Huh?     What does a crazed communist tax dodger intentionally flying his plane into a private office building have to do with Red Coats enforcing The Kings Peace in the British Colonies?

410 posted on 02/19/2010 6:39:21 PM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister

Obviously you miss the obvious link: Taxes.

This man, whether rightly or wrongly, believed he was being oppressed by our government. Having seen but a fraction of the mess of unconstitutional laws I am somewhat inclined to agree with Ayn Rand: “The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. [...] One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.”

Again I present to you the Constitution of the State of New Mexico, Article 2 section 6:
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=jump&iid=66b036fd.eebbfe6.0.0&nid=3dcd#JD_nmcartii-6

Here I present State Statutes 30-7-1, 30-7-2, 30-7-2.2, 30-7-2.4:
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=jump&iid=66b036fd.eebbfe6.0.0&nid=10bad#JD_30-7-1
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=jump&iid=66b036fd.eebbfe6.0.0&nid=10baf#JD_30-7-2
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=jump&iid=66b036fd.eebbfe6.0.0&nid=10bb1#JD_30-7-22
http://www.conwaygreene.com/nmsu/lpext.dll?f=FifLink&t=document-frame.htm&l=jump&iid=66b036fd.eebbfe6.0.0&nid=10bb5#JD_30-7-24

30-7-1 defines “Carrying a deadly weapon.”
30-7-2, using the definition in 30-7-1, makes it [technically] illegal to open carry (publicly accessible places are not on the list of exempted places you are ‘allowed’ to carry).
30-7-2.2 illegalizes self defense as well as open-carry; read section A and its listed exceptions.
30-7-2-4 flatly prohibits firearms on campus for self-defense.

ALL three of those last listed are contrary to the State Constitution. Do you doubt for a second that, despite the State Constitution’s assurance that my right to defend myself with firearms will not be abridged by any law, I would be prosecuted if I took my Glock onto campus with me?

It is PRECISELY this sort of legal shenanigans which can [and will] be used against the people... yes, I would be violating a state law if I did as I proposed. ALTHOUGH, considering the State Constitution, that law is NULL & VOID.


411 posted on 02/19/2010 7:06:49 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson