If the government refuses to follow the law, changing the law will not help. IMO
“If the government refuses to follow the law, changing the law will not help. IMO”
Truer words can’t be spoke. Although the government may simply “miss understand” the law. and thus changing the law to clarify can help.
The problem is it is a lot easier for 9 Federal employees in black robes to ignore the law, then it is for 38 States to agree on how to “clarify” the law to them.
And the truth is those 9 judges need only make a change that is agreeable/beneficial to more then 12 of them states and the renaming states the majority are held hostage as effective slaves with out the inalienable right of Secession.
This is to say nothing of the inherit risks of a constitutional convention, (the only alternative for proposal of an amendment if the federal congress won’t give up power.)
At this point however, I don’t see how we have anything left to lose. We anti got a Federal Constitution to protect our rights in effect anymore anyway. There is pretty much nothing that they can do in a new Constitutional convention that would make our situation worse then it already effectively is in Constitutional lawlessness.
Beyond that our only option and perhaps if the majority be against us and our liberty the only option all together is secession. Now of course we’ve been down this road before where Mister Lincoln demonstrated that might makes right.
If that be the case and might does make right, then it would be clearly necessarily that we secure, prior to our secession, sufficient might to at least deter the might of our slave master from usurping our right of self-determination.
In the case of Texas there is a large supply of Nuclear Weapons not too far from Amarillo. If you want to leave, I suggest you get yer hands on them, as your best hope at Peacefully securing that independents, thou implementation of a MAD policy.