[rabscuttle385]

LOL! Another? You're the one who goes from rational to bonkers in two posts. I've been completely consistent the whole time.

You flip from calling me dishonest to honest to dishonest.

If that's not a flip-flop, I don't know what is.

Oh, and the next time I see that you say SARAH PALIN lacks integrity

By supporting McCain despite knowing of his progressive tendencies, she is demonstrating that she has no integrity.

She is a Republican first, a conservative (maybe) second.

[ohioWfan]

That's because I thought you were honest until you started being dishonest. That doesn't make me a flip-flopper. It just means that I was mistaken about you. And I was.

NOW......until you demostrate some level of integrity yourself (you are woefully lacking in that area, as exhibited on this very thread), then it is clear that you lack the moral judgement on which to accuse another.

Sarah Palin IS a woman of integrity, proven by years of a life well and honorably lived. You have no such record.

[Grunthor]

“By supporting McCain despite knowing of his progressive tendencies, she is demonstrating that she has no integrity.”

It is certainly questionable.