Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CommieCutter

I just demonstrated that it’s not wrong. It’s a perfectly proper use of the English language, which is why it appeared in the paper I cited.

Show me something that demonstrates that “Indianan” is not permitted to be used.


87 posted on 02/20/2010 9:24:41 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Again, it’s Culture; not English.

It’s the official name. That’s all you need to know.

For your use, it would be an “unofficial” use per definition of the word.

-Which would mean “not formal”

-Which would mean “not proper”.

Therefore, it’s not proper to use the word ‘Indianan’.


88 posted on 02/20/2010 9:39:14 AM PST by CommieCutter ("You wanted the presidency, you got it, now FIX THE DAMN ECONOMY!!!!" ----YankeeReb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson