Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sonofstrangelove

I guess this is an Air Force aircraft since it isn’t carrier capable. On second thought, I am not sure the Navy would like carrier security to be handled by the Air Force. I know the USN has refuelers, but are they large enough to handle their basic load of fighters and a 737? Sorry, just thinking out loud before doing the research to get the answers....

....Bob


5 posted on 02/16/2010 10:11:18 PM PST by Lokibob (When handed lemons...Refuse to sign for them. Life's lemons can't be delivered without a signature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lokibob

The answer is in the article, it is a Navy managed project.


7 posted on 02/16/2010 10:14:05 PM PST by Lokibob (When handed lemons...Refuse to sign for them. Life's lemons can't be delivered without a signature.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob
I guess this is an Air Force aircraft

Nope. Navy land based, long distance sub killer/hunter.

This replaces the P3 Orion. That was based on a 1950's Lockeed Electra frame if memory serves me.

10 posted on 02/16/2010 10:16:24 PM PST by llevrok (I speak with a Conservative dialect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob
"I guess this is an Air Force aircraft since it isn’t carrier capable."

It's a Navy bird, just like its predecessor, the P-3 Orion. The Orion, which was built on the old Lockheed Electra platform, also wasn't carrier capable, FWIW.

11 posted on 02/16/2010 10:19:26 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob
I guess this is an Air Force aircraft since it isn’t carrier capable.

The Navy operates many of aircraft that are not carrier capable... the P8 will replace the current P3 anti sub aircraft and the P3 is not carrier capable ... it very common for Navy's to have land based long range patrol anti sub aircraft to be based on airliners

20 posted on 02/17/2010 6:55:27 AM PST by tophat9000 (Obama has "Jumped The Shark" ...and fell in the shark tank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob
I guess this is an Air Force aircraft since it isn’t carrier capable.

Wrong. P-3s, C-9s, C-40s, C-20s and E-6s aren't carrier capable either. Not every plane flown by the Navy is carrier capable.


21 posted on 02/17/2010 7:39:44 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob

The Navy has a number of aircraft that are not carrier capable. P-3s certainly aren’t. Never have been.

I wasn’t aware that the P-8 was built on the 737 airframe. It’s never been one of my favorite birds although there are a lot of them out there. Do not like the way the thrust reversers work.


24 posted on 02/17/2010 2:39:02 PM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob

After much consideration, I think that the long range land-based patrol mission should be USAF’s job. We’ve got too much duplication of abilities among the services. If it can’t take off or land from a ship or the surface of the water, then they Navy shouldn’t have it. If it’s land based, it should belong to USAF. Let the blues do long ranged stuff with planes like the 737 or 767. I’ve always thought the C-2 Greyhound would be the perfect airplane to adapt for the carrier-launched ASW mission.


25 posted on 02/18/2010 11:21:46 AM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Lokibob
I guess this is an Air Force aircraft since it isn’t carrier capable. On second thought, I am not sure the Navy would like carrier security to be handled by the Air Force. I know the USN has refuelers, but are they large enough to handle their basic load of fighters and a 737? Sorry, just thinking out loud before doing the research to get the answers....

ASW has always been a navy task. This is supposed to replace the P-3 already in service.

31 posted on 02/22/2010 4:17:30 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson