Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kackikat
"there is not a legal reason for impeachment yet"

Don't need one, any more than I need a "legal reason" to file a lawsuit against you, which was the point I was trying to make.
200 posted on 02/17/2010 6:11:26 PM PST by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: RightOnTheLeftCoast

Any lawsuit instituted without proper reason invites a counter-suit that will cost you dearly.

In the link I provided there is this quote:

“Constitutional Authority”

“At the time of the drafting of the Constitution, impeachment was an established process in English law and government. The Founding Fathers incorporated the process, with modifications, into the fabric of United States government. The Constitution, however, only provides the framework-the basic who’s, why’s, and how’s. The remaining procedural intricacies reside in the internal rules of the House and Senate.”

The U. S. Code includes the LAW process for implementing the impeachment process.

All of our laws were originally based on English Laws.


203 posted on 02/17/2010 6:38:38 PM PST by Kackikat (There is no such thing as a free lunch, because someone paid, somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson