Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385
You should really start up your own Ron Paul, 9-11 truther site, rab. You know, of course, that the author of this article is a huge Paulite.

I'm curious, do you, as does Ron Paul, believe that the United States of America was the root cause of 9-11?

We've all figured you out by now. Your posting history has narrowed down to 2 subjects only....anti McCain and anti Palin, thus causing you to be irrelevant.

You really should broaden your horizons a little and maybe post an article or two about Obama or Rahm. Now that would be an interesting change up, but one in which I don't think you're capable of doing.

66 posted on 02/16/2010 1:05:51 PM PST by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at a lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: CAluvdubya; rintense; dirtboy; Lakeshark; mnehring; stephenjohnbanker; Bob J; Man50D
You should really start up your own Ron Paul, 9-11 truther site, rab. You know, of course, that the author of this article is a huge Paulite.

And what's your point?

Care to find the post where I said that the U.S. government perpetrated the 9/11 attacks (i.e., the "Truther" conspiracy)?

Or am I just guilty by association (as mnehring claims at post 58)?

Because what ALL (CAluvdubya, post 66; rintense, posts 55, 64, 65; dirtboy, post 56; lakeshark, posts 62, 63; mnehring, post 58) have done thus far is simply attack me ad hominem, something that usually indicates that you really have no argument, or in other words, either all of you are mentally devoid or intellectually lazy (hence the need to fling mud from the start) or maybe just brainwashed.

Your posting history has narrowed down to 2 subjects only....anti McCain and anti Palin, thus causing you to be irrelevant.

And what's wrong with being anti-McCain? He is, after all, a RINO who is numero uno when it comes to campaign finance "reform" (muzzling conservatives), amnesty (one law for the sheep, another for the oxen), and cap-and-tax, and that's not even counting the fact that he voted yea on the fascist bailouts.

If being anti-RINO is "irrelevant" (CAluvdubya, post 66) then the entire Tea Party movement is "irrelevant"--and of course this lends credence to Mr. Hunter's claim in the original post that

real conservative “toughness” might require a real questioning of government at all levels. Unfortunately, conservatives whose attachment to the warfare state remains every bit as passionate as liberals’ attachment to the welfare state, continue to prove they have no serious intention of dismantling big government–only making noise about it.

As for Palin, I'll agree on this one with Sam Wurzelbacher aka Joe the Plumber, who's angry with Palin for going off and supporting the RINO McCain (nevermind my beef with her PAC's financial support for the RINOs Murkowski and Graham).

73 posted on 02/16/2010 2:00:46 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson