Surely you're not going to deny the world a more in depth explanation of your brilliant political theory? Maybe volume one can be on the similarities between the Constitution and Publishers Clearing House and in volume two you can link the Constitution and the Lotto?
When are you going to grace the world with your self proclaimed brilliance in typeset, blabberpuss?
You're always challenging everybody else with your sophomoric catcalls to produce their 'volumes' of works but the only 'works' that you ever produce are the pathetic and glaringly dishonest ejaculations that you puke up all over this board.
Come on, ns! Link us to your Amazon page so that we can all bask in the delicious warmth of your omnipotent and enlightening musings!
Pffftttt.......you're just a totally pathetic poser.
N-S: Surely you're not going to deny the world a more in depth explanation of your brilliant political theory? Maybe volume one can be on the similarities between the Constitution and Publishers Clearing House and in volume two you can link the Constitution and the Lotto?
As I noted previously: "Rules of admission are just that - rules of admission. Only an idiot (or 'Non-Sequitur') would suggest that rules of admission necessarily imply similar rules and authority with regard to departure."
But surely you're not going to deny the world a more in depth explanation of your brilliant political theory:
"I will state for the record that in my opinion the Constitution makes it clear that the need for permission [from non-seceding States] is implied... To put it bluntly, I say permission is needed [for a State to secede]..."
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2446232/posts?q=1&;page=501#536)
Just because there are rules regarding admission? And not even a single written rule regarding departure? Implied? By penumbras, emanations, and permutations? By all means, please enlighten us! Those who believe in 'The Rule of (Written) Law' need to know!!!
'Maybe volume one can be on the similarities between the Constitution and the Peoples Republic of China, and in volume two you can link the Constitution and the Soviet Union?'
;>)