I like this approach.
“Your honor. I insulted the court. I accused a judge of treason. I slept my my disbarred attorney/law clerk and he started filing things in my name. I can’t file things on time.
Due to all my screw-ups, my law license is now at risk.
Because all the cases I screwed up involve the president, his eligibility is therefore putting my law license at risk.
Therefore, I have standing.”
Anyone and everyone has standing against the Communist usurper, as even a Kurdish or Zimbabwean peasant may die as a consequence of his usurpation.
Citizen of the world, eh?
A judge who refuses to examine the Usurper’s eligibility is indeed a traitor and deserves to be called such.
And yes, if he tries to retaliate against the truth-tellers he may thwart his own ploy to commit treason, as that would give standing to his purported victims.
To the extent that you are not yet in a banana republic, that is.
Which is very much in question given what the Usurper has gotten away with.