Not so sure about that. Fruit of a tainted tree is still a potent legal theory in this country.
So is popular sovereignty.
If the founders had thought it wise to make the Supreme Court a French Cour de Cassation, I'm sure they would have.
They designed a very clever system. They insisted the electoral votes be opened and counted in public, with the previous Vice-President in the chair, for a reason. I'm sure it wasn't that they thought Congress had nothing else to do.
They also didn't involve the courts in elections, and that was for a VERY good reason.