[beckysueb]

I agree that Bush is an honorable man. To a fault even. I agree, he should have had someone in there to defend him. I say he gave us Obama because he let the lie stand that he was responsible for the economic meltdown and I think that was key in Obama getting elected coming so soon before the election. Harry Reid started calling for McCain to come back to Washington and after that McCains poll numbers sunk and never came back. I think that was all planned.

[ohioWfan]

And if President Bush had said, "It's not my fault" and gone on to explain exactly what happened (as STARWISE has posted upthread), do you really think that the American people, filled with leftist lying media-induced "Bush fatigue" would have voted for John McCain instead of the flawless god-like Obama?

Not a chance.

The Soros funded left knew that there would be no way anyone would blame anyone else but Bush for the meltdown because they had primed the pump with 8 years of lies. (And they gave zero the words to say to make the ill-informed Americans think that he could solve what Bush messed up). In that, it was definitely planned.

I repeat.....blaming President Bush's lack of self-defense for Obama's election cannot be supported by the overwhelming facts to the contrary.

[DrDeb]

McCain and the Republican Party demanded that President Bush remain silent during the entirety of 2008. . . They got what they wanted . . . If they wanted something else (a defense) then they should have mounted one!!

BTW: If President Bush shouted in the woods (i.e., gave a national speech(es)) and no one was around to hear it (i.e., the MSM refused to air more than negatively framed sound bites) did the shout actually occur?