Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz

Of course he is, any moron could see that was an unsafe design. 100, 200 athletes,, whatever the number are left with a track that is designed like crap.

Telling him to withdraw if he thinks the track is a menace is ridiculous, why is it so unreasonable to expect the equipment be up to modern standards? Why shouldnt the designer be held responsible for his design?

I bet if a highway had an obviously dangerous flaw in the design, you wouldnt dismiss the death of a friend by saying,,”it’s all on the driver”, he could have stayed home”


31 posted on 02/14/2010 2:24:32 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs earn the title of "man's best friend", Muslims hate dogs,,add that up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: DesertRhino
Good post. It's frustrating to see so many FReepers basically say, "Tough cookies, he knew the risks." What a bunch of heartless dweebs.

Show me any highway in America that would have oak trees or concrete pillars located three feet from the road at a high speed turn. Show me! That the designers had open, and completely unprotected steel girders lining the track 36 inches away from a harrowing turn is a criminal design flaw.

This poor kid should not have lost his life over this obvious fault.

37 posted on 02/14/2010 2:58:57 PM PST by Obadiah (Democrats and their life partners, the MSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson