Skip to comments.
Pondering a Congress without Kennedys
The Boston Globe ^
| February 13, 2010
| Michael Levenson
Posted on 02/13/2010 6:24:48 AM PST by Malone LaVeigh
Patrick Kennedys unexpected decision not to seek reelection to the US House prompted widespread reflection yesterday on how swiftly the political climate had changed, from the adulation for Edward M. Kennedy after his death to the voter fatigue that has helped end the familys decades in power.
With Patrick Kennedy bowing out amid dismal poll numbers, some read the shift as a measure of the declining political cachet of the family name. Others say it goes deeper, reflecting the fading popularity of the activist federal government the Kennedy family has long championed.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; kennedy; kennedyfamily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
I think people felt there would always be a Kennedy in Congress someplace,
There's always janitorial services.
To: Malone LaVeigh
Perhaps some of the Kennedys are actually going to work for their salary.
2
posted on
02/13/2010 6:27:45 AM PST
by
Huskrrrr
To: Malone LaVeigh
Unfortunately not having Patches in Congress makes it harder to keep track of him.
Although I suppose you could just follow the trail of carnage he leaves with his car...
3
posted on
02/13/2010 6:28:27 AM PST
by
MAexile
(Bats left, votes right)
To: Malone LaVeigh
The congressional IQ (as low as it is) went up a smidgeon after the death of the felon.
Of course, religious folks can always use the Kennedy family as proof that evolution does not always work.
4
posted on
02/13/2010 6:29:36 AM PST
by
Da Coyote
To: Malone LaVeigh
We’ll quickly get over it. We got over “a congress without” a Lodge, a Saltonstall, etc. Hopefully soon we’ll have a “congress without” a Byrd and a Rockefeller.
To: Huskrrrr
Pondering a Congress without Kennedys Pondering a crime scene without criminals.
6
posted on
02/13/2010 6:30:57 AM PST
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: Malone LaVeigh
“Pondering a Congress without Kennedys”
Pondering a garbage can without stinking used diapers.
7
posted on
02/13/2010 6:31:20 AM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule. - H. L. Menken.)
To: FormerACLUmember
In honor of the occassions lets PARTY.
To: Malone LaVeigh
Pondering a news cycle without Kennedys, and cycle after cyle with never a mention of Kennedys.
A better world for all.
9
posted on
02/13/2010 6:32:49 AM PST
by
Will88
To: Malone LaVeigh
Maybe people are just wising up to the Kennedy’s unearned sense of entitlement. Patrick, a drug addled moron, is entitled to a House seat because he is a Kennedy. Caroline, an incomprehensible nitwit, should get a Senate seat because she is a Kennedy.
Yecchh! These Kennedys make me vomit!
10
posted on
02/13/2010 6:33:31 AM PST
by
Freds2nd
To: Malone LaVeigh
The Kennedys are like herpes . . .
I'm sure we'll see another outbreak in the future . . .
11
posted on
02/13/2010 6:33:48 AM PST
by
blues_guitarist
(ISLAM=DEATH!! . . . . . . black & humble . . .)
To: Malone LaVeigh
It will be safer to drive around the Capitol at night.
12
posted on
02/13/2010 6:34:01 AM PST
by
AU72
To: Huskrrrr
Perhaps some of the Kennedys are actually going to work for their salary. Did someone say ... WORK?!!
To: Malone LaVeigh
Cwe then have a sign put on the capitol building that says:
“Entering a Kennedy-free Zone”
14
posted on
02/13/2010 6:37:55 AM PST
by
rod1
To: rod1
Sorry typing too fast previously.
Can we then have a sign put on the capitol building that says:
Entering a Kennedy-free Zone
15
posted on
02/13/2010 6:38:42 AM PST
by
rod1
To: Malone LaVeigh
Pondering a Congress without Kennedys
16
posted on
02/13/2010 6:39:43 AM PST
by
Zakeet
(Obozo: Rapidly moving from to WTF to FUBAR to SNAFU)
To: Malone LaVeigh
Kennedy-free at last, Kennedy-free at last. Thank God almighty that Congress will be Kennedy-free at last.
17
posted on
02/13/2010 6:40:16 AM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Special SOTU tagline: YOU LIE!)
To: Malone LaVeigh
“Pondering a Congress without Kennedys...” suffocating liberty.
I feel more optimistic already. I hope they don’t let the door hit them in the backside, or maybe it should.
18
posted on
02/13/2010 6:41:42 AM PST
by
dajeeps
To: Huskrrrr
they have more time to drink,maybe find a real job nah Obozo will make an appointment to some useless program for the ingrate to be the head of.
19
posted on
02/13/2010 6:44:28 AM PST
by
boomop1
To: Malone LaVeigh
A Congress without any Kennedy's, is like a Jonestown without a JONES."
20
posted on
02/13/2010 6:45:54 AM PST
by
FrankR
(Those of us who love AMERICA far outnumber those who love obama - your choice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson