He acknowledges prior cyclical temperature rises, but says the recent one cannot be accounted for in the sun...so it must be human!
Funny, he also admits temperatures haven’t risen in the past decade..so what caused that? Doesn’t say.
Yet when tree ring data from the medieval period indicates a warming trend, he discounts the data, because they supposedly couldn't prove that the warming was global. Robert Mcintyre has already busted Jones on this, for taking a localized subset of data that fit Jones's hypothesis, rather than global data that doesn't, even though the data (wood borings to determine a warm climate (wide bands of tree rings) or cold climate (narrow tree rings) had already been collected, and available.
So which is it, Jones, did you have definitive global data worthy of yelling FIRE!!!! in a theatre or did you cherry pick and fabricate the data to suit a long and prosperous carreer?
"***That's for an independent panel to determine***"
Sounds like he's taking the 5th. Repeatedly.