To: tobyhill
They shouldn’t be obstructing his appointments. They should have a vote and not confirm them until he nominates more center of the line people.
2 posted on
02/12/2010 4:02:02 AM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: driftdiver
They need to do what the Rats did to President Bush every step of the way, block everything!
Remember Bolton?
Make them pay for what they did to this true patriot.
3 posted on
02/12/2010 4:06:39 AM PST by
tobyhill
To: driftdiver
No... they do not have the votes to do so and the dims used this for years against Bush. You are wrong... they should stay in session... the dims rotated one guy in and out to block Bush's appointments.
LLS
5 posted on
02/12/2010 4:14:17 AM PST by
LibLieSlayer
(hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
To: driftdiver
They shouldn’t be obstructing his appointments. They should have a vote and not confirm them until he nominates more center of the line people. Obama? "Center of the line people"? Gimme a break!
Even if the Senate "rejects" an Obama candidate via filibuster, he will just wait until the Senate is not in session & put them in office anyway, won't he?
6 posted on
02/12/2010 4:17:30 AM PST by
ChrisInAR
(You gotta let it out, Captain!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson