Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Nice try your "one-ness". No sale.
1 posted on 02/11/2010 8:56:55 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, ping


2 posted on 02/11/2010 8:57:11 PM PST by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Since they can’t do business across state lines, I’m wondering how President Manchild thinks it’s his business and not California’s.


3 posted on 02/11/2010 9:01:37 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (ALSO SPRACH ZEROTHUSTRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Sounds more like SickPoint.


4 posted on 02/11/2010 9:05:23 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

WellPoint exists to make money and if you do not like their slight rate increases you can go without insurance or find another product in the marketplace.


8 posted on 02/11/2010 9:20:08 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Hey, if making that money is so damned easy, why aren't investors rushing in to grab customers from Wellpoint?

Answer: because it isn't easy money.

Whatever Wellpoint is doing to provide insurance, it's hard enough that people with money to invest are staying out of it.

10 posted on 02/11/2010 9:28:54 PM PST by GeorgeSaden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, who received the company's explanation in a letter Thursday, said "it remains difficult to understand" how premium increases of that size by can be justified when WellPoint Inc. reported a $2.7 billion profit in the last quarter of 2009.

Of course it is difficult for you to understand. Basic Economics is apparently outside the grasp of everyone in your administration.

11 posted on 02/11/2010 9:34:39 PM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It would be a good idea to have health insurance companies subject to antitrust laws.


15 posted on 02/11/2010 10:42:29 PM PST by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Could be the Wellpoint CEO is a socialist giving Obomber some ammo.


16 posted on 02/11/2010 10:57:33 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

0bama Zombie says; “must ... attack ... free ... market”


17 posted on 02/11/2010 11:08:06 PM PST by TigersEye (It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Did he expect them to do anything else?

Rename, repackage, rewrite it a tad smaller, and sell another pig in a poke.

Tennessee has joined several other states in trying to pass a Health Care Freedom Act. NO COLAs for granny, retired Military or retired fed employees. BIG NEW fees for Tricare for Life retired over 65 Military's secondary health ins. (DOD bill already passed, delayed but goes into effect 2011)

New Dem mantra: Woof, woof eat dog food granny....ala let them eat cake.

Obama's War on Seniors

Socialized Med Thread

TRI CARE FOR LIFE This from a google search:

Link

This option would help reduce the costs of TFL, as well as costs for Medicare, by introducing minimum out-of pocket requirements for beneficiaries. Under this option, TFL would not cover any of the first $525 of an enrollee’s cost-sharing liabilities for calendar year 2011 and would limit coverage to 50 percent of the next $4,725 in Medicare cost sharing that the beneficiary incurred. (Because all further cost sharing would be covered by TFL, enrollees could not pay more than $2,888 in cost sharing in that year.)

Link

Link

Bill Would Restrict Veterans’ Health Care Options 11/06/09

Buyer and McKeon Offer Amendments to Protect Veterans and TRICARE Beneficiaries

Congress plans to block Tricare fee increases
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/10/military_tricarefees_blocked_100709w

By Rick Maze - Staff writer, Oct 7, 2009

Tricare fee increases imposed last week by the Defense Department will be repealed by a provision of the compromise 2010 defense authorization bill unveiled Wednesday by House and Senate negotiators.

Snip

The fee increases were announced on Sept. 30 and took effect on Oct. 1, but the defense bill, HR 2647, includes a provision barring any fee increases until the start of fiscal 2011.

Snip

Retired Army Maj. Gen. Bill Matz, president of the National Association for Uniformed Services, said the announcement of fee increases was shocking considering that the Obama administration promised earlier this year to hold off on any new fee Tricare fee increases until fiscal 2011.

“President Obama and DoD assured NAUS and the entire military family earlier this year that there would rightly be no increases in any Tricare fees” in fiscal 2010, Matz said. “We took them at their word, and I can’t believe that a co-pay increase like this was allowed to go forward,” he added.

21 posted on 02/12/2010 7:10:58 AM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson