Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freekitty

I supported him initially. Until his polling went nowhere. Then I jumped to Thompson. After that it was no one until McCain added Palin. I don’t have a problem with Hunter. I do have a problem with allowing preference for someone to override judgement about their chances for higher elective office.

Ex. I have some issues with Palin but overall like her. I don’t think polls right now mean much of anything but I don’t think she is a lock for a nomination let along winning the W.H. if she was. If there are no other conservatives and she isn’t polling well then I favor supporting the long shot anyway. If there are other conservatives with a better shot, I’ll jump ship to the one polling higher even if they weren’t my first choice. It’s not about the person with me. Not anymore. At one time it was, but I learned my lesson with G.W.B. Loyalty to an individual will not come before success at pushing a conservative agenda and my allegiance will be with the conservative who polls best in ‘12 whether or not my heart is with that person or not.


136 posted on 02/11/2010 11:14:52 PM PST by Soul Seeker (?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Soul Seeker

I wouldn’t go by polls and there is so much crookedness in these races. Hunter is and was the best conservative candidate. He has a plan and he spoke clearly about his plan and how he would implement it. But the powers to be had already settled the race. It was Obama vs McCain. I think this woke some of the people up.


137 posted on 02/12/2010 8:29:58 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson