Replies

Of course. Despite her adamant denial, and lack of proof of her having anything to do with them.

And of course, idiots here can swoon over abortion supporter and gun grabber Scott Brown because “good people” can disagree on the sanctity of a child’s life and the meaning of the 2nd Amendment. Right?

And of course abortion supporter and amnesty queen KBH is OK, because she didn’t botch a question about 911 on Glenn’s show?

And Perry is OK to force his Merck buddy’s worthless vaccines on all Texas Children and to steal people’s land for a Mexican Expressway because good people can disagree on these issues?

Frankly sounds to me you are looking for a reason to support a RINO

For starters look up Debra Medina's column 'Latinos and the GOP'

'It’s a shame isn’t it, that Republicans continue to ignore Hispanics especially here in Texas?' Debra Medina

'Ignore them', Mrs Medina? Since when? What more do you want? Or shouldn't we ask?

Medina ad:

“Who is going to think more about Latino families? Rick Perry, Kay Bailey Hutchison or me, who has a Latino family?” (Medina’s cultural heritage is German and Bohemian.)

She told a colleague last month in an e-mail. “Being married, however, to someone with a Mexican American heritage, I certainly embrace the culture.” But before she explained that, she told my colleage, who had asked her whether she considers herself Latina: “I’d not consider myself anything other than a wife and mother, a nurse and a patriot. I believe we too often get into race when it’s immaterial.”

No, Thanks, Mrs Medina.

She is also running Spanish ads. Hello Mrs.Medina! If they cannot speak English then they have no business voting IMO. When they learn English then let them vote. Assimilate. Learn English. Appreciate all America gives you.

So I’m sure she is blowing a lot of hot air just like Obama did just to get elected. Running those ads and saying what she has, tells me the border issue is just a try to get votes for herself.

Medina is about as qualified to be Governor as zero was to be President- want to re-visit how that is working out? She's a Libertarian running on the Republican ticket. She is supported by the Ron Paul worship crowd and she herself has acted in the Ron Paul worship capacity. She has demonstrated a lack of knowledge about Texas law and current ballot initiatives.

No, thanks, I’ll stick with ‘ol RINO Perry. Texas has remained in better shape than almost any if not all of the states in the union under Perry's watch. As someone said, 'he's the devil we know'.

The motly crew running for governor is laughable; a MUSLIM, a trecherous RINO woman* (Hutchison) and a woman with questionable loyalties

*Feds Have Built Only 32 Miles of 700 Mile Double-Border Fence Originally Mandated by Congress “One reason DHS has been able to do this is an amendment that Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R.-Texas) slipped into an omnibus appropriations bill that Congress passed on December 18, 2007. Hutchison’s amendment put a loophole in the fence law that allowed the secretary of Homeland Security not to build the fence Congress had mandated the year before.”

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/43422

______________________ .

LOL, who said anything about abortion? Or Scott Brown? Or Merck?

I’m not looking for a good reason to support a RINO, believe me. Like I said, I’m from California and I’m used to not just RINOs, but full-on radical socialists and communists. So from my experience, a RINO looks pretty damn good compared to what I’ve had to put up with. I’d much rather have a good, principled conservative, but we don’t have that option unfortunately. I’m not going to cry and whine and take my ball and go home, just because I don’t have a perfect candidate to vote for.

From what I’ve read of her other views, Medina sounds like she had a lot of things I could agree with. But the truther stuff just blew all that completely out of the water. I heard her interview, and read her denial. I don’t buy it. If you’re REALLY not a truther, it’s inconceivable to give an answer like she gave to Glenn Beck. The ONLY correct answer to his question would have been “Of course not”, not the mealy-mouthed sputtering she gave. There’s something behind that answer, and it’s ugly and repellent. It was a simple yes or no question, and she gave the wrong answer. Sorry, but with an issue like 9/11 trutherism, you don’t get to give a weasel non-denial denial. To me it’s like she was agnostic over the Holocaust, or whether the earth is flat.